Obamacare - “RFID Chip Implants”
Posted 12 March 2012 - 01:54 PM
Are you ready to have your RFID Chip Implanted?
3/23/2013 is your date!
By Fred Brownbill on February 14, 2012 in Constitution Legal Watch
This new Health Care (Obamacare) law requires an RFID chip implanted in all of us. This chip will
not only contain your personal information with tracking capability but it will also be linked to your
bank account. And..... get this, Page 1004 of the new law (dictating the timing of this chip)reads and I quote: "Not later than 36 months after the date of the enactment."
It is now the law of the land that by March 23rd 2013 we will all be required to have an RFID chipunderneath our skin and this chip will be link to our bank accounts as well as have our personal records and tracking capability built into it.
On Sunday March 21, 2010 the Senate Healthcare bill HR3200 was passed and signed into law the following Tuesday. Page 1004 of the new law (dictating the timing of this chip), reads, and I quote:
“Not later than 36 months after the date of the enactment” H.R. 3200 section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph1.
“The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of post-market safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘and is— ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act:
A class II implantable device is an “implantable radio frequency transponder system for patient identification and health information.” The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in medical patients such as “claims data, patient survey data, and standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary.”
Class III devises are items such as breast implants, pacemakers, heart valves, etc.
A Class II device that is implantable is, as you seen from the FDA, an implantable radio frequency transponder, RFID chip. From breast implants, to pacemakers, to RFID chips which one is the only possible one that can used for the stated purpose in section B which is, “for linking such data with the information included in the registry”? As we know from subsection A, the information in the registry is the name of a device. In plain speak, we are in a clear way being told that our electronic medical records are going to be linked to a class II implantable device!
On Sunday March 21, 2010 the Senate Healthcare bill HR3200 was passed and signed into law the following Tuesday. Like I said before, there are a legion of horrible and just plain evil aspects to this bill and I’m sure you’ve heard a lot of them by now. I don’t want to discount them but what cannot be missed here is this new law now opens a prophetic door on a magnitude not seen since the reformation of Israel.
“The Secretary to protect the public health; shall establish procedures to permit linkage of informationsubmitted pursuant to subparagraph (A, remember subparagraph A is the class 2 implantable device reference) with patient safety and outcomes data obtained under paragraph (3, which is electronicmedical records); and to permit analyses of linked data;”
Continuing on to page 1007, in the STANDARDS, IMPLEMENTATION CRITERIA, AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA section, the secretary of health and human services is given full power to intact all mandates from the laundry list of to-do items in the creation process of the registry as well as dictate how the devises listed in the National Medical Device Registry are to be used and implemented.
“The Secretary of the Health Human Services, acting through the head of the Office of the NationalCoordinator for Health Information Technology, shall adopt standards, implementation specifications,and certification criteria for the electronic exchange and use in certified electronic health records of a unique device identifier for each device described in paragraph 1 (National Medical Device Registry), if such an identifier is required by section 519(f) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i(f)) for the device.”
Posted 13 March 2012 - 01:50 PM
Posted 05 September 2012 - 06:29 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users